Brandon Nakashima vs Matteo Arnaldi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Mar at 10:21 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Nakashima vs M. Arnaldi

USA
2
Win
Played
1
Win

ITA
2
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Nakashima 2 - 1 Arnaldi
They have played 9 sets in total, with Brandon Nakashima winning 5 and Matteo Arnaldi winning 4. The last match between Brandon Nakashima and Matteo Arnaldi was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 10-03-2025, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Brandon Nakashima getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nakashima | 2 |
| Arnaldi | 1 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R3) BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells(03-10-25)
(QF) Delray Beach Open - Delray Beach(02-14-25)
(Robin) Next Gen ATP Finals - Milan(11-08-22)
B. Nakashima vs M. Arnaldi H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $3,667,225 | Career Prize Money | $2,532,865 |
| 60.37% (259-170) | Career Total W/L | 59.90% (239-160) |
| 1 | Hard | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 8 | Titles | 6 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 52.46% (32-29) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.45% (20-24) |
B. Nakashima vs M. Arnaldi Match Preview:
In analyzing the players' recent second serve performance over the last six months, Nakashima has secured 49.86% of points on their second serve, narrowly trailing Arnaldi, who has won 50%. This particular statistic bears a high correlation with match prediction accuracy, hinting that Arnaldi might enjoy a slight edge here.
Assessing their return game stats, Nakashima has capitalized on 38.42% of their opponent's second serve points, while Arnaldi has been more effective, winning 43.2%. Furthermore, when considering the return on first serves, Nakashima's success rate stands at 21.43%, which is outpaced by Arnaldi's 27.42%. This comparison might suggest a leaning towards Arnaldi as the potential favorite in this head-to-head encounter.
In terms of resilience under pressure, Nakashima has shown a robust ability to save 64.16% of breakpoints lately. On the contrary, Arnaldi has saved 56.94% of these critical points, which can provide insight for in-game betting scenarios.
Turning to their overall performance overview, Nakashima has claimed victory in 60.76% of the matches in the past year (W/L 48/31), slightly surpassing Arnaldi's 54.72% win rate (W/L 29/24). This broader view supplies context for making a head-to-head prediction.
Considering surface preferences, Nakashima flourishes on indoor hard surfaces, boasting a 69% career win rate (W/L 58/26), whereas they find clay surfaces more challenging, with a 52% win rate (W/L 29/27). In contrast, Arnaldi thrives on clay, with an impressive 66% win rate (W/L 125/64), yet struggles on indoor hard courts at 41% (W/L 15/22).
Regarding the tennis calendar, Nakashima has predominantly competed on the Main tour, securing 52.78% victories (W/L 19/17), while Arnaldi has participated extensively in the Masters series, achieving a 60% success rate (W/L 12/8). The level of competition each player regularly encounters can heavily influence the interpretation of their win-loss records.
The context deepens by examining direct H 2H matches, with Arnaldi previously overcoming Nakashima 7-6(2), 6-4 at the Delray Beach Open. This included one tiebreak, where Arnaldi triumphed 1-0. The average encounter between these players lasts approximately 1 hour and 43 minutes, yet they haven’t contested a deciding set.
Opposition caliber over the past year shows Nakashima has faced opponents holding an average rank of 87.18, whilst Arnaldi contended with higher-ranked players, averaging 57.09. Predictions could further favor Nakashima if the match extends to a decider, with Nakashima securing 58% of deciding sets in the last 12 months, compared to Arnaldi's 44%.
Finally, dissecting break point conversion rates reveals Nakashima boasting a 29.73% success rate, slightly better than Arnaldi's 27.52%. This subtle advantage could weigh in Nakashima’s favor during high-stakes game moments.
While both players exhibit unique strengths, taking into account their return game effectiveness and previous H 2H results, Arnaldi emerges as the projected winner, especially if he can leverage his superior recent record against higher-ranked adversaries.
Brandon Nakashima vs Matteo Arnaldi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Nakashima vs M. Arnaldi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 39 | Games Won | 35 |
| 15 | Aces (Total) | 21 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:42:43 | Average Match Time | 1:42:43 |
| 65% (137/212) | 1st Serve % | 60% (127/211) |
| 77% (105/137) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (98/127) |
| 59% (44/75) | 2nd Serve Win % | 56% (47/84) |
| 55% (6/11) | Break Pts Won % | 27% (4/15) |
| 31% (66/211) | Return Points Win % | 30% (63/212) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. Nakashima Recent Matches Played
M. Arnaldi Recent Matches Played

B. Nakashima vs M. Arnaldi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.37% (259/170) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.90% (239/160) |
| 58.66% (623/439) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.91% (560/407) |
| 52.93% (5576/4959) | Games Win/Loss | 52.58% (4842/4366) |
| 60.48% (127/83) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.71% (85/55) |
| 50.00% (35/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.35% (132/70) |
| 67.00% (67/33) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.30% (18/29) |
| 61.22% (30/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 0.58 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 2971 | Aces Total | 1621 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 711 | Total Double Faults | 1126 |
| 1:46:48 | Average Match Time | 1:45:46 |
| 282.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 302.44 |
| 64% (20242/31697) | 1st Serve % | 59% (16488/28035) |
| 74% (15063/20242) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (11281/16488) |
| 54% (6180/11455) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5794/11542) |
| 37% (1023/2729) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1155/2712) |
| 37% (12113/32928) | Return Points Win % | 40% (10868/27336) |
| 48.89% (22/23) | Slam W/L | 56.25% (18/14) |
| 46.97% (31/35) | Masters W/L | 54.39% (31/26) |
| 100.00% (3/0) | Cups W/L | 80.00% (4/1) |
| 58.86% (93/65) | Main Tour W/L | 48.57% (34/36) |
| 69.40% (93/41) | Challenger W/L | 59.84% (73/49) |
| 73.91% (17/6) | Futures W/L | 70.27% (78/33) |
| 60% (229/379) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (223/367) |
| 57% (26/46) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 43% (12/28) |
| 54% (135/248) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (76/131) |
| 50% (67/135) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (68/133) |
| 85% (261/223) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (242/200) |
| 15% (261/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (242/42) |
| 20% (167/34) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (156/37) |